Designing and Fabricating Solar Cells: First Place in Competition

I recently entered and won a competition to design and fabricate solar cells.  First place was given to the team which produced the highest efficiencies.  Our team manufactured 18% efficient single junction silicon solar cells (I know, I know, that sounds low, but this efficiency meets today’s industry standard!).

It was a year-long project spanning over my final two semesters at VCU.  I had the opportunity to work with Samantha Hoang, Anthony Pedicini, and Sam McDonald; we were a team of electrical engineers and physicists.  Congrats guys, and thanks for a great year!

We used a potassium hydroxide – isopropyl alcohol  (KOH-IPA) solution in water to randomly etch the smooth and highly reflective silicon surface.  This created a variety of texturing patterns, as is seen below, depending on the orientation of the silicon crystal with respect to the wafer surface.  After rigorous experimentation, we finally optimized the solution mixture ratio and temperature.  The interesting blue figures below show results from four different texturing experiments.  The bottom right figure shows the randomized pyramid texturing pattern used for the final device wafers.


Our final texturing method created random pyramids ~1-10 um wide.
The figure below is a profile measurement of the final device cells (left figures are 30 minute texturing, right figures are 60 minute texturing).  The benefits of light trapping are clear upon inspection of the figure.  With a flat surface, the light would reflect immediately away from the device; however, a textured surface would allow light to bounce toward the device and be reused.  The tall protrusions are where the metal contact would later be installed.

We also experimented with an anti-reflective coating (ARC).  We thermally grew a silicon dioxide ARC on the surface of the cells at 1000 oC in a dry oxygen ambient.  The idea was to grow ~125 nm thin-film (1/4 wave length) that would reduce the reflection coefficient (i.e. increase optical absorption) at the surface of the polished crystal.  The final results for using ARC were similar to the results from the texturing experiments.


Our final efficiencies are shown to the right for each of the experimental designs.  The label ‘passivated cells’ is just a fancy way of saying Anti Reflection Coating (‘passivating’ the cells is technical jargon that has to do with carrier recombination at the surface of the crystal, but the passivation coating also function as the ARC).





Advertisements
This entry was posted in Engineering and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Designing and Fabricating Solar Cells: First Place in Competition

  1. Marcus says:

    Brilliant! In my limited amount of time spent looking into this subject, I had presumed a structure would need to ‘capture’ the light. I hadn’t though of something that was ‘reflecting’ light back onto the surface. Less surface area of the structure is needed and less resources are wasted in the process.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s